In a significant legal development, U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant of Sherman, Texas, has issued a nationwide injunction halting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) of 2021. The CTA mandates that corporate entities disclose their beneficial owners to the U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as a measure against money laundering and other illicit financial activities. Judge Mazzant's decision, delivered on December 3, 2024, deems the act likely unconstitutional, citing overreach of federal authority and infringement on states' rights as protected by the Tenth Amendment.
Enacted in January 2021, the CTA requires corporations, LLCs), and similar entities to report detailed information about their beneficial owners. This includes personal identifiers such as full legal names, addresses, birth dates, and taxpayer identification numbers. The primary objective is to enhance transparency and curb the misuse of anonymous corporate structures for activities like money laundering, terrorism financing, and tax evasion. Non-compliance carries substantial penalties, including fines of up to $10,000 and potential imprisonment for up to two years.
The CTA has faced multiple legal challenges questioning its constitutionality. In March 2024, a federal judge in Alabama ruled the act unconstitutional in the case of National Small Business United v. Yellen. The court concluded that the CTA exceeded Congress's legislative authority and violated constitutional limits. However, the injunction from this ruling was limited to the plaintiffs involved, including the National Small Business Association and its members, as of March 1, 2024.
Judge Mazzant's recent ruling expands the scope by issuing a nationwide injunction. He argued that the federal government’s attempt to regulate entities created under state laws encroaches upon areas traditionally managed by states, thus violating the Tenth Amendment. Mazzant described the CTA as an "unprecedented" federal intrusion into state affairs, emphasizing that corporate formation and governance have historically been under state jurisdiction.
The injunction arrives just weeks before the CTA's compliance deadline of January 1, 2025, creating uncertainty among businesses required to report beneficial ownership information. The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), a plaintiff in the Texas case, expressed relief, noting that the ruling provides small businesses a reprieve from the compliance burdens associated with the CTA. Caleb Kruckenberg, litigation director at the Center for Individual Rights, representing the plaintiffs, stated that the injunction allows small businesses to avoid the "quasi-Orwellian" requirements of the act. At the same time, higher courts consider the constitutional issues.
Despite the injunction, FinCEN has indicated that it will continue implementing the CTA for entities not covered by the court's order. In a notice dated March 4, 2024, following the Alabama ruling, FinCEN stated that it would comply with the court's order concerning the specific plaintiffs but would enforce the CTA for all other reporting companies. This stance suggests that unless further judicial decisions extend the injunction's scope, many businesses may still be obligated to comply with the CTA's reporting requirements.
The U.S. Department of Justice has declined to comment on the Texas ruling. However, it previously filed an appeal against the Alabama court's decision, indicating the government's intent to defend the CTA vigorously. Legal experts anticipate that these cases could progress to higher courts, potentially reaching the Supreme Court, providing a definitive resolution on the act's constitutionality.
In the interim, businesses are advised to stay informed about ongoing legal developments and consult legal counsel to understand their compliance obligations. The current legal landscape remains fluid, and entities should be prepared for potential changes in reporting requirements depending on the outcomes of pending appeals and further judicial review.
Judge Mazzant's nationwide injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over federal authority and states' rights. While the ruling offers temporary relief to certain businesses from the act's reporting mandates, the ultimate fate of the CTA will depend on the outcomes of forthcoming legal proceedings. As the situation evolves, businesses must remain vigilant and proactive in understanding their legal responsibilities to ensure compliance with applicable laws. Stay tuned for more news regarding the next steps for those already filed.
Sources:
